Category: Mugar Site

  • December 2017 Mugar Update

    December 2017 Mugar Update

    What’s Happening with Mugar?

    December 3, 2017 Update

    In 2015, Oaktree Development proposed a 219-unit housing development on the environmentally sensitive Mugar parcel in East Arlington, invoking the state Chapter 40B provisions which allow housing developments with a certain affordable component to skirt local land use controls.

    The project has been on hold since December 2015 when Arlington’s Zoning Board of appeals (ZBA) asserted that the Town has met one of the “safe harbor” thresholds available under Chapter 40B, that of having 1.5% of eligible land area devoted to affordable housing.  If achieved, that status gives the Town far more control over 40B projects and limits the developer’s ability to override local zoning and wetlands protections.

    Oaktree disputed the Town’s findings, and the state Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) agreed with Oaktree.  In early 2017 the Town appealed the 1.5% decision to the next level, the Housing Appeals Committee (HAC).

    In a separate court proceeding, the Town of Arlington sued the state to obtain data needed to support its 1.5% calculation, and the Town prevailed.

    Now – finally – the 1.5% appeal is scheduled to be heard by HAC in late October. HAC may then take several months to hand down a decision.

    When that decision comes it cannot immediately be appealed to a court of law by either party.  Instead, the actual substantive hearing process on the project would commence, led by the Zoning Board of Appeals, and continue to a conclusion (either an approval, a rejection, or an approval with conditions).  At that time, whichever party continues to dispute the 1.5% calculation could raise it as an issue in a court challenge.

    Why shouldn’t the Mugar Parcel be developed?

    The 17-acre Mugar parcel lies almost entirely in the 100-year floodplain as defined by the 2010 FEMA mapping, and includes substantial wetland areas.  The site is a remnant of the Great Swamp of Alewife Brook, a tidal marsh which once handled tidal floodwaters naturally, but has been degraded and filled over the past century.  With increasing development, and increasing rainfalls, our surrounding and downstream neighborhoods, streets and roadways are threatened with more frequent, and more severe, flooding.

    Oaktree’s development scheme calls for 219 units of rental housing and over 300 at-grade parking spaces to be built on the western end of the site, covering acres of the site with impervious surface and displacing identified wetlands.

    In invoking the provisions of Chapter 40B, the developer has given notice that it intends to seek waivers from many of the local Arlington regulations that protect sensitive natural resources.

    Arlington Land Trust continues to advocate for the permanent protection of the Mugar parcel as conservation land.  The site is subject to regular and significant flooding, and is a critical stormwater buffer for the surrounding and downstream neighborhoods of East Arlington.

  • Arlington ZBA appeals adverse ruling by state

    Arlington ZBA appeals adverse ruling by state

    December 15, 2016:  The proposed development of the Mugar Parcel is headed to the state Housing Appeals Committee for the next round of procedural argument.

    Arlington’s Zoning Board of appeals (ZBA) has asserted that the Town has met one of the “safe harbor” thresholds available under Chapter 40B, that of having 1.5% of eligible land area devoted to affordable housing.  If achieved, that status gives the Town more control over 40B projects and limits the developer’s ability to override local zoning and wetlands protections.

    Oaktree disputed the Town’s findings, and in its November 25th decision the state Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) agreed with Oaktree. These are technical arguments involving precise reading of the statutes, and have never been tested in court. It is likely that the Housing Appeals Committee, a quasi-judicial body housed within DHCD, will side with the developer as it does in the vast majority of cases.

    The decision of HAC may take up to eight months, and cannot immediately be appealed to a court of law by either party.  The hearing process on the project itself would have to continue to a conclusion (either an approval, a rejection, or an approval with conditions).  At that time, whichever party continued to dispute the 1.5% calculation could raise it as an issue in a court challenge.

  • Mugar 40B Application Submitted

    Mugar 40B Application Submitted

    August 31, 2016:  Oaktree Development has submitted its application to the Arlington Zoning Board of Appeals to build a 219-unit development at the Mugar site.

    The entire document set is available to download HERE.  At 225 pages it is best to right-click and download the file rather than trying to open in a web browser.

    Arlington Land Trust continues to advocate for the permanent protection of the Mugar parcel as conservation land.  The site lies almost entirely in the 100-year flood plain, is subject to regular and significant flooding, and is a critical stormwater buffer for the surrounding and downstream neighborhoods of East Arlington. 

  • Zoning Board asserts ‘safe harbor’ protection from hostile 40B proposal

    Zoning Board asserts ‘safe harbor’ protection from hostile 40B proposal

    September 30, 2016: The formal hearing process on the Oaktree Development proposal to develop the Mugar site began at the September 27th meeting of the Arlington Zoning Board of Appeals, with the ZBA asserting that the Town of Arlington has met one of the ‘safe harbor’ criteria provided by Massachusetts Chapter 40B.

    If a community can demonstrate that 10% of its housing stock, or 1.5% of its land area, is devoted to qualified affordable housing then it can exercise greater discretion in handling of a 40B application. Such projects are empowered by 40B to request waivers from local bylaws regarding zoning, wetlands and other restrictions if those restrictions are more stringent than state law, and routinely do so. And local boards are required to grant them if the stricter local bylaws would render the project “uneconomic”. However, a Zoning Board can decline any such requests if the community has met one of the “safe harbor” criteria.

    The ZBA’s calculations show that Arlington has slightly over 1.5% of its land area in qualified affordable housing. Oaktree disputes that calculation and announced at the hearing that it would appeal the claim to the state Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD), which should be expected to render its opinion in roughly 60 days.